 |
"In the News" |
|
Peter Magill
by
Peter Gambaccini
Runner's World
Magazine |
|
Peter Magill, 42,
of South Pasadena, CA and Team
Runners High was the men's
master's titleist at the USA Cross
Country Championships in
Indianapolis on February 7,
covering the frozen 6K course in
18:40
|
Peter Magill, 42,
of South Pasadena, CA and Team
Runners High was the men's
master's titleist at the USA Cross
Country Championships in
Indianapolis on February 7,
covering the frozen 6K course in
18:40 to beat runnerup
Mike
Scannell of Front Line Racing by
24 seconds. Magill's teammate
David Olds, the USA masters champ
in 2003, took fifth in 19:43. In
December, Magill was second in the
masters competition at the USA
Club Cross Country in Greensboro,
NC with a 33:17 for 10K that left
him one-and-a-half seconds behind
Bob Winn of the Greater Lowell
(MA) Road Runners. In his best
masters track season in 2002,
Magill clocked a 8:31.08 in the
3000 and 3:56.42 in the 1500.
Flu-ridden in the aftermath of his
Indianapolis win, Magill returned
Runner's World's call declaring "I
had to drink a couple of cups of
coffee just to dial the darn phone
this morning."
Runner's
World Daily: When did you
turn 40?
Peter
Magill: In June of 2001. I
didn't exactly race when I turned
40 because I started training
right before that. I thought I was
going to get right back in shape
after years off, and it took me a
year to even to get in shape to
get in shape, you know? At 39, I
was 195 pounds, smoking a couple
of packs of cigarettes a day, and
drinking a couple of six packs of
beer a day.
RWD:
What a fine citizen!
PM:
Yeah. And I thought "this really
isn't good." And my job at the
time, as a screenwriter, was
extremely stressful, and I thought
"I just need to get back in
shape," and I'd always intended to
run as a master. It took me almost
three months before I could even
run five miles. I'm 165 pounds
now.
RWD:
What was your running like when
you were younger?
PM:
I ran back in my 20s, but like a
lot of runners who work hard when
they hit the masters ranks, I had
one of those "on and off again"
running careers when I was young.
I'd run a couple of years, take a
couple of years off. I was far
more interested in partying and
having a good time. I was off
entirely for six years, but that's
only because I ran for four months
when I was 34. Before that, I was
off another five years. So I was
off, pretty much, for 11 years.
RWD:
You came very close to beating Bob
Winn at the Club Championships 10K
in December.
PM:
I got sick a couple of days before
the race. I was gasping for breath
the whole way. It was really
painful. David (Olds) also wasn't
feeling 100 percent there and we
decided before the race we were
going to run nice and
conservatively and help each other
finish. We had no regrets about
that at all because our prime
motivation there was to win the
club championship, to have our
club, Team Runners High, from
Southern California take down the
Northern California club, the
Reebok Aggies. And we did, by
four-and-a-half (aggregate)
minutes
RWD:
Did you think you'd progressed
enough that you had a shot at
winning the USA masters race in
Indianapolis?
PM:
I had great cross country season
in the fall. I had a 24:39 8K in
the Riverside (CA) Cross Country
Invitational. I was consistently
running in the high 14:40s, low
14:50s for 5K, which for us
masters guys is pretty good.
Honest to God, I figured, if Eddy
Hellebuyck doesn't show up for the
race, there's not another masters
guy who's going to take me. But
you never know. The day before, I
felt very strong, and I was so
motivated to win after getting
nipped in Greensboro that I went
into it (Indianapolis) fairly
confident - the only caveat being
that Mike Egle, who ended up
taking eighth place, had beaten me
three times in the mile
previously. So there's a little
mental thing going on there. You
have to overcome that. And I
hadn't run against Mike Scannell,
who ended up taking second, and I
know he just got Michigan Runner
of the Year. So when you haven't
faced people, you don't know what
they're going to have, which is
why I played it a little
conservatively over the first 4K
of the race and then picked it up
over the last 2K.
RWD:
Is the rivalry between Team
Runner's High and the Reebok
Aggies a heated one?
PM:
We really wanted to beat them in
Greensboro. But with most masters,
your opponents are your best
friends as soon as the races are
over. There's a camaraderie to the
whole sport that wasn't
necessarily there when we were all
younger. You take the wins,
they're fun, you go for them, but
what's most important is just
competing and having everybody out
there.
RWD:
Right. The anomalies, the
exceptions, are the guys who are
nasty or try and hit you with
elbows out on the road.
PM:
That just doesn't work for me.
When you run into somebody like
that as a master, it kind of takes
you back, because you're wondering
"what haven't they learned that
the rest of us have learned?" Most
people by the time they turn 40
have gone through enough in their
own lives so that they're just
ready to have a hobby and an
outlet that's a positive
experience, and not this insane
competition anymore.
RWD:
Have you improved on your 2002
masters times of 8:31 for 3000 and
3:56 for 1500?
PM:
I haven't, because last year, I
didn't train at all having the
fall (of 2002). One of the reasons
I did cross country now is because
I decided I'd actually bring a
base into the track season, so I'm
hoping to improve significantly on
those this year. I'm looking for a
sub-4:10 in the mile, to get me a
little bit closer to Tony Young.
To be perfectly honest, I still
think of myself as an 800 and
1500-meter runner. This season, I
intend to focus pretty much on
those two. I'd like to do one 5000
and put a time down closer to what
the top guys in masters are doing
right now, 14:20 or under. But I
really want to get my 800 back.
Masters running is about fun as
much as it's about anything. To
me, the 800 and the 1500 are that
combination of that speed and
endurance. There's a sense or
freedom when you're moving fast
and moving far enough to at least
make a little bit of a race out of
it. In the 800, I'd like to do at
least 1:55. If I can't do at least
that, the 800 will be put on the
back burner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|